Sitting In A Tree http://www.sittinginatree.com Match Making Services Fri, 17 May 2013 13:52:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 During-The-Date Etiquette http://www.sittinginatree.com/during-the-date-etiquette/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/during-the-date-etiquette/#comments Fri, 17 May 2013 13:52:00 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5628 During-the-date etiquette

A big question is always “Who pays?”. For my thoughts on this, please see one of my earlier blog posts:  http://www.sittinginatree.com/to-pay-or-not-to-pay/

Are there any topics that are taboo to discuss on a first date? Some might answer: “Yes, do NOT discuss religion, politics or past relationships on a first date”. There are many reasons why this is the general rule, however, as you may know – I believe rules are made to be broken, and do not really have a place when it comes to matters of the heart.

Making and sustaining conversation on a first date can be challenging at best – adding limitations and rules around what to talk about, and what not to talk about, can add undue pressure to an already potentially awkward or uncomfortable experience.  What’s important is to know your audience, to know yourself and to understand how others may perceive you, your opinions and your anecdotes.  Whether it’s subconscious or not, deliberate or unintentional, you are being evaluated by your date. They are determining whether you are a suitable mate for them (as you are likely doing too – them for you) and you will not know ahead of time what the criteria is. They may not even know.

Understand that any information you share forms the basis of their opinion of you and that the less they know you the more room there is for interpretation, assumption and misunderstanding.  Similarly, sometimes less is more as it creates intrigue, mystery, curiousity and…ultimately…interest.

Wherever appropriate – and without overdoing it – qualify questions.  Say to your date “That’s a great question…I’ve never been asked that before! I’m curious, before I answer, why you ask”.  See if you can both put some context around your discussion without making it too formal so that it’s properly “framed” and the likelihood of a misinterpretation is reduced.  For example, if your date asks you if you’ve ever been married before he/she could be asking because:  a)  that might be a deal-breaker for them; b) it might be an experience they can relate to, c) they are genuinely curious and believe it’s an obvious and necessary question to begin to get to know you.

People have asked me what’s appropriate to order (to eat) on a first date. Here are some guidelines:

1) Ask your date if they’re interested in sharing before ordering anything. Sharing can be fun, flirtatious, sensual or just a simple way to break the ice.

2) If you’re getting the “vibe” and feel like being playful – feed your date a bite off your plate. If done casually and naturally, this can be a huge turn-on.

3) Be honest about what you eat and what you don’t eat. If you’re sharing and your date suggests something you don’t like, say so. Frame it like this: “I don’t really eat seafood [as an example], so the calamari and shrimp are out, but I like the seven other choices – so please pick your favourite.”  Please just be careful not to get into a monologue about your battle with anorexia/bulimia as a teenager, your long list of food allergies, your diabetes, or any other ailment that plagues you.  At least not on a first date.  It’s too much information and can be perceived as a turn-off.  Conversely, once a person has established that they are interested in you romantically and the relationship is progressing – what you or your date might have initially thought was a “big deal” easily becomes a moot point, or at the very least, less critical in the selection/deselection thought process.

4) If you’re hoping for a good night kiss, don’t eat anything with onions or garlic, OR be sure to brush your teeth and/or chew gum after dinner.

5) If you’re a female, and you order a salad, make light of the fact that you’re playing in to a stereotype (because, you are).

6) Don’t take yourself too seriously. I used to be self-conscious about the fact that I can be a messy eater. Now, I favour self-deprecating humour in that regard. It takes the pressure off me, and sometimes entertains my dates.

First Date Kiss – To Have or Not to Have?

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again (thanks for the quote Ferris Bueller) – I do not believe in “rules” when it comes to dating and relationships. Kissing is a wonderful and beautiful thing, and a great way to determine whether physical chemistry exists. If the moment is right, and it feels good, do it. If you prefer to wait until you know the person better, then wait. When it comes to being physical, it should always be about your comfort level.

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/during-the-date-etiquette/feed/ 0 Spring Date Ideas http://www.sittinginatree.com/spring-date-ideas/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/spring-date-ideas/#comments Thu, 16 May 2013 16:15:23 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5626 Well, as they say…”spring has [finally] sprung”.  Here are some date ideas for both singles and couples.  If you have any unique ideas you’d like to share, we’d love to hear them via info@sittinginatree.com.

Idea # 1:

Grab a frisbee and hit a park. Unless you’re part of an Ultimate Frisbee league, chances are the last time you threw around a Frisbee was as a kid.  It’s a great way to enjoy a nice day while getting to know someone over a casual activity to break the ice or as a family/couple activity.  The last time I played Frisbee, I was in my early 20s.  I was visiting some friends at McMaster University (my brief alma mater) in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada and was taken to this paradise on earth (Webster’s Falls) that I had never known existed so close to the urban centers it’s hidden among.

Idea # 2:

Go ziplining. You don’t need to be on a cruise or in Costa Rica to enjoy the adrenaline rush and sense of adventure ziplining provides. If you do some research you should be able to find a location closer to you than you might’ve thought.

Idea # 3:

Patio hop, on foot or by public transportation. Each of you pick two patios you’ve never been to, write them on individual pieces of paper, fold them up, put them in your pocket/purse and select one new destination every hour (or every drink or whenever the mood strikes).  It keeps the date unpredictable and ensures a degree of spontaneity.

Idea # 4:

When was the last time you picked up a racquet?  Borrow one from a friend or dust off your own and hit a public tennis court (or your country club if you’re a member). Sharing a physical activity with a date is another great way to break the ice and if the activity is not your forté, it can elevate the entertainment value (because, if you’re like me – a little clumsy, and don’t take yourself too seriously – you may provide some comedic relief).

Idea # 5:  

Go on a hike.  If one or both of you have pets, children or both, it’s a great group activity that gives you the opportunity to explore your own environment, get some exercise, breathe in the great outdoors while still being able to engage in conversation (assuming the hike is moderate enough that you can climb and still talk at the same time).

It’s almost time for amusement parks to open up for their season. Great date spot. Go on a rollercoaster ride. Apparently anything that gets the adrenaline going helps to create sexual chemistry. Give it a try!

 

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/spring-date-ideas/feed/ 0 Games To Amuse Yourself With http://www.sittinginatree.com/games-to-amuse-yourself-with/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/games-to-amuse-yourself-with/#comments Wed, 15 May 2013 17:30:43 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5622 If you’re suffering from dating fatigue, loathe the idea of dating, have been “taking a break from dating”…or are just plain bored and fed up, instead of worrying about the game playing that you might believe plagues dating, try playing some games with yourself – for entertainment, amusement and distraction.

Game # 1:

Challenge your single friends to see who can go on the most dates in one month…BUT…the “catch” is that the date doesn’t count if the person doesn’t want to see you for a second date.  If you and your friends are “game”…you can get creative with how the “winner” is rewarded.

Game # 2:

Challenge yourself to get five strangers of the opposite sex to engage you in conversation by the end of the week, in random places – like the grocery store, the bank, stuck in traffic, etc.  If phone numbers are exchanged, great…but tell yourself you’d be satisfied with even the exchange of a smile or two.

Game # 3:

Instant message five people who you wouldn’t normally engage with, on a dating or social media site of your choice. I dare you.

Game # 4:

After your next date, write a review (like a movie review) – in the third person.  Share the review with your date and see if they agree (good, bad or ugly).

Game # 5:

See how long you can go without approaching a person of the opposite sex for the purposes of dating them.

While these “games” may seem trivial, pointless, or otherwise unproductive – what have you got to lose?  Remember Einstein’s definition of insanity (doing the same thing over again and expecting a different outcome) and ask yourself if what you’re already doing is working for you?

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/games-to-amuse-yourself-with/feed/ 0 Post-Date Etiquette http://www.sittinginatree.com/post-date-etiquette/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/post-date-etiquette/#comments Mon, 13 May 2013 14:59:40 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5619 Post-date etiquette.

You’re a woman. You’ve gone on a date with a man.  You like him.  You had a good time.  He paid for the date – you want to thank him…again.    It’s the day after the date.  Is it OK for you to message him?  As I’ve mentioned in previous posts, men like to chase.  Even progressive, modern men.  Even if they don’t realize it.  So, my preference is to let him chase. Many women can find this difficult because they are not in control of the outcome.

We often make excuses for why we need to be the one to reach out after a first date (he’s shy, he’s insecure, maybe we didn’t give him the impression that we were interested, etc) but the reality is that – in most cases – if the guy wants to call, or follow up, he will. 

I’m not saying to the women “don’t call”…I’m just suggesting that you be mindful of the possible consequences (i.e. he doesn’t call back, he’s not interested, he’s turned off that you’re doing the “chasing”)…before you do call.

If you’re able to, the best approach – in my experience – is to let the cards fall where they may, which means leaving the courting in the guy’s hands. As my friend Carmen, and The Beatles, would say: “Let It Be”.

You’re a man.  You’ve gone on a date with a woman.  You like her but you’re not sure if she likes you. You want to ask her out again.  How long should you “wait” to do so?

I think most of us have heard about the “3-day rule”, right?  Well, because I don’t subscribe to “rules”, I think you should ask for a second date when it’s convenient and right for you. If that’s during the first date – go for it. If it’s the next day while you’re driving in to the office before a very busy day, then do it then. If it’s next week because you’re going on a golfing trip with your buddies the day after the date, that’s fine too.

I realize there is the fear of seeming too eager, or not interested enough. Both scenarios can easily be tempered based on what you say, not when you say it. For example, if you are calling the day after the date to ask for another you could say something like: “I had a really nice time with you last night. I have a really busy few days coming up and didn’t think I’d have the opportunity to call so I’m calling now to see if we could arrange another date for early next week”. In this example, even though you’re calling the next day it’s not like you’re trying to see her again that same night – which some may perceive as clingy/needy. You’re telling her that you’re interested, organized, and able to make a plan in advance (so important guys!)

Women know – just as men often do – by the end (or beginning?) of a date whether they’d be open to seeing you again (something I’m trying to change). Very rarely will the timing of your call sway her one way or the other (unless she’s interested and you wait “too long” to call or too much time passes – by her standards – between dates).  Ladies – please try and CALM DOWN.  Men view “time” differently than we do, and while you may have a notion in your mind of how this potential “romance” is going to play out, just because it doesn’t go at the pace you imagined, doesn’t mean it’s not going anywhere.  The more you romanticize, fantasize and idealize the way things will unfold, the more frustrated and annoyed you will ultimately become.  And don’t tell me (or yourself) that you don’t do that – because we all do…not just women (although we are more prone).  I’ve done it, I’ll do it again – and so have you, and so will you.  Which, he will sense, and it will be over before it had a chance to begin.  Men’s “spidey-senses” are powerful and the last thing a man wants is to feel he’s “in trouble” before he’s even decided if this is the woman he wants to be accountable to.

OK, now let’s say you are either a man or a woman. You’ve decided to ask for a second date. Should you do so by telephone, text, BBM or e-mail?

While I am, admittedly, the worst phone person ever (i.e. I hate talking on the phone), I am a sucker for tradition. I think there is something to be said for picking up the phone and asking for a date the old-fashioned way, especially with all of the other options available. It shows interest and requires a slight effort – on both parts.

 

Does that mean text, BBM and e-mail are uncouth? No, it doesn’t. I know for a fact that it happens that way every day and is more the norm than the exception. Just remember that if you are looking for a meaningful, committed relationship there should be something between text and sex – if not phone calls, then some good emotional bonding in person. 

 

Many people in my profession recommend no sex until monogamy. I don’t think that’s a bad idea – in theory – but often easier said than done. As with anything else, this really boils down to expectations (are yours realistic?), choices (do you understand what your options are?) and consequences for your actions (there is no “right” or “wrong”, “good” or “bad”). 

Check out a previous blog I wrote for more thoughts:  http://www.sittinginatree.com/2011/04/to-sex-or-not-to-sex/

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/post-date-etiquette/feed/ 0 Pre-Date Etiquette http://www.sittinginatree.com/pre-date-etiquette/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/pre-date-etiquette/#comments Fri, 10 May 2013 15:22:38 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5616 Pre-date etiquette.  Is there such a thing?  For example – who does the asking out? Is it appropriate for women to ask men out?  Who plans the date?

As recently as when the baby boomer generation was dating there were universally understood “rules” and etiquette around dating, courtship and marriage.  Whether one followed those rules was their choice, however, they likely knew what they were.  Today – with the advent of technology, the feminist movement, blurred gender roles and expectations, alternative forms of “relationship” and a host of other societal factors – there do not seem to be universal rules to follow.  There is a lot of confusion in the world of dating and the daters I know are often seeking guidance.

I believe that anything goes these days. Women are far more independent than they were even 15 years ago and, as a result, are more confident going after what they want…including men.

In my experience, men are divided on this subject. Some men love an empowered and assertive woman who has the balls to ask them out and others would prefer to do the asking.

My only word of caution to the ladies who are comfortable initiating a date with a man is this: men are hard-wired to be the hunters…even those who say they are liberated and seem open to being asked out by a woman. If a man is dating two women simultaneously (or has just met two women of interest) and with one the traditional gender roles are more blurred, even if only on a subconscious level, he will naturally gravitate toward the less assertive woman in the long run…as a generalization.

Once a date has been arranged – who plans where to go, what to do?

Some people believe that whoever did the inviting should do the planning. Some people think that it should always be the man. There is no right or wrong. Each dater has their own set of values and expectations and the key is in communicating those. I have seen two dates (in the last month alone) go off the rails because of the way the plans were handled…or not handled.

If you are asked what you want to do on your date, be honest. Keep your language positive, maintain benefit of the doubt (you don’t know this person if it’s a first date, therefore assumptions are dangerous) and be flexible.

For example, you may say: “One of the reasons I was excited to go out with you is because I heard you’re really creative so I was looking forward to seeing how that translated into a wonderful first date. If you’re OK with it, surprise me – I’ll be happy to try anything you suggest” This politely tells the other person that you had an expectation and a preference, all while enhancing their self-esteem.

Or, you could say – when asked what kind of food you like: “I love anything except for Greek and Thai food and love trying new restaurants.” This gives your date some guidance and reassures them that you’re not the “whatever you like” type…that you’re flexible, but that you know what you want and you know what you don’t like…and you’re able to communicate that in a way that doesn’t make you sound difficult,  rigid or negative.

If you like to be the planner but are unsure if it’s appropriate, you could say something like: “Since we’re going out in my neighbourhood and you’ve been kind enough to offer to come to me, would it be easier if I choose where we go?”

Is it appropriate to go out for dinner on a first date?

I’m not a big fan of universal rules when it comes to dating. I think that what’s most important is that the people involved are comfortable and are able to act somewhat naturally. With that said, many active daters use the first meeting as an opportunity to assess physical chemistry and, therefore, like to have an “out” in case they’re not attracted to their date.

Dinner is typically a longer, more expensive commitment than grabbing a coffee, for example – so for this reason it’s become less and less popular as a first date option. People don’t want to be “stuck” across from a stranger until they’ve determined that they’re interested in them. Also, assuming the man is traditional and expects to be paying for the date, he may not want to spend money on someone he will never see again.

Despite this, there are still people who go for dinner on a first date and there’s nothing wrong with that. As mentioned, it boils down to personal preference, and what you’re comfortable with.

For those doing the asking, and/or the planning, just know that it’s not necessary to go overboard for a first date – it’s actually better that you don’t – and if you are inclined to suggest dinner, know that some of your dates will find that to be too much “pressure”…and, if that were to the be case, they would not likely tell you that’s how they’re feeling. Know your audience.

When going out on a first date should the man offer to pick the woman up at home? Should the woman let him?

I have had female clients go into a first date already with a bad taste in their mouth because the man did not offer to pick them up. I have had female clients ask me what was wrong with the men who did offer to pick them up and I’ve had confused male clients ask me what the proper etiquette is.

I think that first dates can be challenging for both men and women. It would be nice if both parties could have a genuine interest in ensuring that the other person will be comfortable wherever they go and however they get there. When planning and discussing the date, it can be as simple as saying: “I was going to suggest a cute little place that seems to be about halfway between you and me. I presume you would like to meet me there but am also happy to pick you up. Which is better for you?” This shows that the person has given the date some thought, that they are flexible, that they are sensitive to the other person’s sense of privacy and independence but that they are also willing to be traditional and chivalrous, if that’s the preference.

From a safety perspective, even for the most traditional daters, I do think it’s a good idea to meet your date in a public place until you’re comfortable with them….especially when you’ve met online. Be cautious of the false sense of security inherent in set-ups (i.e. family and friend endorsements), meeting people through “friends” on social media sites and drawn out pre-meeting communications. Just because your grandmother gave him a glowing recommendation (because it’s her bridge partner’s grandson) or because you have 27 mutual contacts on Facebook doesn’t mean that they are “good people”. You need to find out for yourself, and the best way to do that is to meet in public while preserving your privacy, and listening to your gut…always.

People are always asking me what to wear on a first date. It’s pretty simple. Wear something you’re comfortable in, bearing in mind that – contrary to popular belief – sexiness is a state of mind, not something you achieve via your wardrobe.  Wear something you’d wear to meet your date’s family or friends. Females – show a little skin, but not too much. If your legs are covered, show some shoulder, arms and/or MODEST cleavage. If your upper body is fully covered, wear a skirt.

Also, consider working with an Image Consultant (Sitting In A Tree offers this service) if you’re just getting back in to the dating game or if you feel your image/wardrobe could use a pick-me-up.  Men – this goes for you too!

If you have any “dating etiquette” questions, please feel free to e-mail them to:  info@sittinginatree.com.  We’ll consider answering them in a future blog.

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/pre-date-etiquette/feed/ 0 A Few Lessons Learned In Love http://www.sittinginatree.com/a-few-lessons-learned-in-love/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/a-few-lessons-learned-in-love/#comments Thu, 09 May 2013 15:16:18 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5614 If you are remotely introspective, reflective and open to learning from your experiences – and if you’ve ever been “in love” – then you might agree that the “lessons” to be learned are endless.  Love can be a profound experience, one that often defies logic, rationale and common sense.  The heart wants what the heart wants…which is not always aligned with the rest of you.

Lesson # 1: Your gut is your guide.

Listen to it. It exists for a reason and serves a purpose.  Had I listened to my gut – my internal and moral compass – I wouldn’t have married the person I did.  Don’t get me wrong.  I do not regret my decision to marry the person I did, loved him very much at the time, and took my wedding vows very seriously but, in hindsight, I knew something was wrong, almost from the beginning, and too often I hear the same story from others…that they knew – as they walked down the aisle – that something wasn’t right.

When something isn’t sitting right inside you, when you have an “icky” yet indescribable feeling, when there is a discomfort or pit in your stomach that you can’t quite pin down…that’s your gut and it’s talking to you. Listen to it.  A brilliant woman I once had the pleasure of working with during my healing journey said simply:  If it feels yucky, then it’s yucky.

Lesson # 2: Compatibility trumps chemistry.

Although it’s that elusive “chemistry” that most of us seem to be chasing, it’s not usually what forms the foundation of a healthy and sustainable relationship. Chemistry might bridge the gap from strangers to lovers but it’s not the glue that keeps couples together…compatibility is. When you’re compatible it means that you share similar values, morals, parenting styles, lifestyles and relationship goals (to name a few).

I’m not saying to favour compatibility over chemistry or that the two are mutually exclusive.  I’m simply suggesting that you weigh the two at least equally, and be weary of relationships built solely on chemistry.

Lesson # 3: Resentment toward another person is really just disappointment with yourself.

When you resent someone for their actions (or lack of) it should be an alert to yourself that you have unresolved feelings which require processing and follow through.

Think of the last time you felt “resentful” or used the word “resent” to describe how you were feeling.  Wasn’t it because someone else had done something (or not done something) that affected you negatively?  Did you say anything to that person?  Did you address the issue with them?  If you were feeling “resentment” then the answer is “probably not”.

Now…think of the last time you constructively told someone how their actions affected you negatively. How did you feel after? Probably relieved, resolved, empowered, liberated…better.  When you are feeling resentment it’s because you haven’t been honest with yourself about how you’re feeling.  You have not given the other  person the opportunity to address the issue and work through it, together.  Resentment often goes hand-in-hand with silence.  When this happens, the only person who suffers is YOU.

Typically, feeling resentful necessarily means that the other person (people) do not know how you’re feeling, so it’s impossible and unfair to hold them accountable.

The residual affect of having your feelings unaddressed and allowing them to fester inside of you is what we know as resentment.  It is a “you” issue, not a “them” issue.

Lesson # 4: How you feel when you’re away from a romantic interest is just as important as how you feel when you’re with them.

If you find that in someone else’s absence you’re anxious, on edge, insecure, suspicious, uncomfortable or otherwise overly distracted by thoughts of them and what they might be doing, who they might be doing it with and why you’re not hearing from them then it’s usually a sign that either you have some issues to work through and/or you are not with the right person.  In a healthy, emotionally safe relationship, you feel secure in your relationship whether the person is physically in your presence or not.

What lessons have you learned from love?

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/a-few-lessons-learned-in-love/feed/ 0 Top 5 Dating Guidelines http://www.sittinginatree.com/top-5-dating-guidelines/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/top-5-dating-guidelines/#comments Wed, 08 May 2013 14:36:04 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5608 Stacie’s Top Five Dating Guidelines 

 

Since I do not believe that there is a place for hard and fast rules in dating and, specifically, in love…here are some guidelines.  These are suggestions, and are not meant to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list.

Unlike an earlier post “How to be More Successful in Dating” (http://www.sittinginatree.com/how-to-be-more-successful-in-dating/), this post is more of a “beginner’s guide to dating”…for those who are just getting started…for the first time, or for the first time in a long time.

 

Guideline # 1: Don’t have too many/any dating rules

The more open you are, or – put another way…the less rigid you are, the more you avail yourself to possibilities, opportunities, surprises, and even perhaps…miracles.

In my mind, “rules” and “boundaries” are different. An example of a rule might be: A man must phone me before Wednesday in order for me to accept a date for Saturday night (borrowed from the popular dating guide from the 90s – aptly entitled “The Rules”).  An example of a boundary might be: I will not tolerate any rude behaviour from any date under any circumstances.

 

Guideline # 2: Revisit your definition of the word “date” and consider modifying it

If you’re willing to relax your idea of what constitutes a date to include virtually any interaction you might have with the opposite sex (or same sex if you are gay, or open to practicing your interpersonal and flirting skills with anyone), you increase the number of opportunities you have to connect with someone else and decrease the disproportionate amount of pressure most of us put on each individual date (in the traditional sense).

Being open to conversation, non-verbal exchanges, flirting and the unexpected – wherever you are, and whoever you’re with – is a way to “date” more often and to have it be a much more fulfilling endeavour. Try it! What do you have to lose?

 

Guideline # 3: Be sure you are happy with you

I mentioned in my “To Pay Or Not To Pay” blog (http://www.sittinginatree.com/to-pay-or-not-to-pay/) that it’s important to Know Thyself. While that self-awareness is instrumental in dating, and more broadly, in “life”, it should extend to loving yourself too (in other words – you can know yourself really well and still not love yourself – we want you to have both).  It is very difficult to be successful in dating and to attract the right partner for you when you don’t feel good about your offering. It’s like a salesperson trying to sell a product they don’t really believe in.


Guideline # 4: Make Sure Your Decisions Support Your Goals

If you’re looking for a committed, monogamous relationship then do not agree to a casual relationship with anyone, hoping it’ll turn into something else or thinking that it’ll help pass the time until Mr. /Ms. Right comes along. If you only want a no-strings-attached arrangement, don’t try to be in a relationship because that’s what someone else wants.  In other words – accept that being alone is far better than being in an arrangement that doesn’t fulfill your needs.  In order to do that, you have to know what you need.  I posted on one of my FB pages recently (https://www.facebook.com/OriginalThoughtsByStacieIkka):

If you don’t know what you need, you can’t ask for it.  If you can’t ask for it, then you’re probably not going to get it.

 

Guideline # 5: Have fun!

While dating – for many – is a means to an end, it is much more enjoyable when it’s viewed as a journey unto itself. An adventure, full of spontaneity, surprises and fulfillment. When you see it as a chore, it’ll inevitably feel like one. 

If you are genuinely having fun with your dating, you will automatically attract more options into your life. “Fun” is sexy, attractive, alluring and self-fulfilling.

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/top-5-dating-guidelines/feed/ 0 How To Tell Someone You’re Dating That You Don’t Want To Go Out Again http://www.sittinginatree.com/how-to-tell-someone-youre-dating-that-you-dont-want-to-go-out-again/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/how-to-tell-someone-youre-dating-that-you-dont-want-to-go-out-again/#comments Tue, 07 May 2013 14:13:50 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5606 *Stacie’s Top 5 Considerations*

Consideration #1: To communicate or not to communicate

Whether you’ve gone out on one date or three (or perhaps you haven’t even made it to the first date but have had some form of communication) it is always difficult to know how to proceed when you decide you no longer wish to pursue someone romantically.

Men get a bad rep for being “assholes” when they don’t call or text and seemingly “disappear”, however, women are just as guilty of doing the same. The difference is – most men don’t sit around talking about it with their buddies, so it doesn’t seem to be as well-documented.

In most cases, the Houdini act is one’s attempt at not hurting the other person’s feelings…there is rarely any malice behind it (although the women I’ve spoken with – and some men – allow their imaginations to think otherwise). Often, too, it has nothing to do with YOU and everything to do with THEM. Never profess to know what is going on in someone else’s life.

While I don’t believe in dating “rules”, per se, I do believe that communicating – something – is better than no communication at all.

 

Consideration #2: What form of communication to use

I’m an old-fashioned kinda of gal (while simultaneously being a texting whore – I’m a bit of a walking contradiction)…so I always prefer the phone (or face-to-face) for important conversations. That said, it really depends on how long you’ve been seeing this person and what the nature of your communication has been like – i.e. what precedents have already been set?

The general “rule of thumb” – bearing in mind that I don’t typically subscribe to rules – to be used as a guideline only, is as follows:

Zero to two dates:  text or e-mail is fine
Two to four dates:  E-mail or phone
Five dates or more:  Phone or face-to-face

Consideration # 3: To be honest or to spare feelings (often – but not always – mutually exclusive)

I strongly believe – whether in dating, or otherwise – that honesty is the best policy and that the worst truth is better than the best lie. How many times have you gone on a date with someone who you were interested in, never to hear back from them again?  Or, to have them feed you what you know to be b.s. lines, like “It’s not you, it’s me”, “I’m just really busy with work right now”, “I’m not ready for a relationship”, “I’ll call you soon – when *everything* calms down a bit”…and the list goes on.  Even if it were to sting a little bit, wouldn’t you have preferred to know the actual reason why? What if that feedback could help you improve your dating success with other suitors?

I coach and encourage my clients to tell the truth – sometimes including brutal, yet well-packaged, honesty. If you don’t want to see the person again because you found that the conversation was lacking – tell them that. It is all in the delivery. Not everyone will appreciate your candor or feedback, however, MANY will, and those people will go on to become better, more informed and more successful daters. Think of it as contributing to the greater good of increasing the frequency and volume with which romantic connections are formed.

If we all keep running around sugar-coating and sparing feelings, nobody in the dating community learns anything – about themselves, the process, or others’ perception of them.  Instead, we keep sending each other back into the dating pool thinking “well, it had nothing to do with me…obviously THEIR LOSS”…which might be true, but we are not doing each other (the collective dating community) any favours.

Please go to www.sittinginatree.com and read the blog called “Match Made On Palmerston Avenue”. It is meant to be a good example of how the smallest detail could send a potential love connection off the rails and how the benefit of perspective, insight, having an open mind, and even enlisting the help of an objective, experienced third party, can salvage potentially lost/missed opportunities.

 

Consideration #4: What to say and how to say it

What to say: the truth.
How to say it: diplomatically.
That is the simplest approach.

Whatever you do though – please do not say: “I just didn’t feel any chemistry”. While that might be true, it’s the biggest cop-out and doesn’t help anyone. Before you decide to stop seeing someone, get real with yourself. Figure out the actual reason. If you’re not physically attracted to them, tell them that, nicely.  It is likely something they have felt toward other people they’ve dated, so it’s something they can relate to while being less vague than “no chemistry”.  Nobody likes to hear that someone else finds them less than attractive, but – over time, if not immediately – it’s something most of us can get our heads around.

If you felt the conversation was awkward…say so. If you were put-off by the fact that they were late, or cancelled twice, or whatever the case may be – say so.

Whatever you say – in order to remain diplomatic, here are some general tips:
1) Use “I” rather than “you” whenever possible
2) Maintain their self-esteem. For example, instead of saying: I thought it was rude that you expected me to split the cheque with you and found you to be quite cheap, say: I’m sure that you have the ability to be generous but I was not prepared to share the bill and was caught off guard. In other words, try to avoid any character assassination and focus solely on the particular circumstances, rather than the person.
3) Share accountability where appropriate. So, instead of saying: You didn’t really talk that much and I felt like I had to keep the conversation going, say: I know first dates are often uncomfortable, and I was nervous too (if you were) so I found the conversation difficult to maintain and would’ve found it helpful if you had made more of an effort to initiate conversation or contribute more than one-word answers.
4) Compliment them/say something positive (only if you can do so while being genuine). For example, in closing, say something like: I did enjoy our time together. I particularly liked the story you told me about __________, or the part of the evening where we ______________ and would definitely recommend you to a friend (if you would)…I just don’t believe that we’re a match, and that’s OK. That is the purpose of dating. I wish you well and thanks again for a lovely evening/day/few dates/etc.

 

Consideration # 5: What to expect in response
a) Nothing
b) A simple “Thank you, I had a nice time too”…which is usually an indication that the feeling was mutual, and is the classiest response
c) “Thank you, I had a nice time too and was feeling the same way”.  Mutual.  Classy.  Honest.
d) An expression of disappointment with a subtle plea for another chance. This is where people may surprise you, or where you may consider opening your mind a bit more, enough to give them another chance.
e) Anger. Where/if this is the response – remember that this is their issue, not yours – especially if you followed the tips on how to package the message with diplomacy, tact and sensitivity. In these cases, just be thankful that you dodged a bullet.

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/how-to-tell-someone-youre-dating-that-you-dont-want-to-go-out-again/feed/ 0 How Technology Can Ruin A Relationship http://www.sittinginatree.com/how-technology-can-ruin-a-relationship/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/how-technology-can-ruin-a-relationship/#comments Sun, 05 May 2013 14:16:07 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5602 Technology Mishap # 1: 

Misrouted or misdirected e-mails. I wonder how many times someone has sent a message intended for their lover/mistress…to their spouse…in error.

Ever hear any stories that would fall into this category???  We would love to hear them.

Technology Mishap # 2:

Undelivered text or BBM.

This happens to me on a regular basis. A BBM is not delivered. I presume the person is on the phone. Hours go by. Message still undelivered. OK, so the person has turned their phone off. But why, I wonder?!? And the imagination takes over…

Has this ever happened to you? Have you ever sent a message that the recipient claimed to never have received? It happens. Trust me.

Technology Mishap # 3:

Facebook.  How Facebook fits into this category could be a blog topic unto itself.  Anything from an ex creeping your new beau’s wall and “pissing” all over it to mark their proverbial territory, to wondering why your partner has just added, or been added by, a certain individual, to losing quality time in your relationship to independent Facebook activity, to affairs beginning as a result of connecting with an old flame on Facebook, and the list goes on.

Anyone have any first hand stories about how Facebook has spoiled their fun, or more seriously…ruined their relationship?

Technology Mishap # 4: 

Lost cell phone.

I wonder how many times two people have met for the first time with all of the promise of a budding relationship, one puts the other’s number in their phone, only to then lose said phone, with no way to retrieve their new love’s phone number. It’s not like anyone remembers actual phone numbers anymore…and so many people date without knowing the last name of the person they’re dating (at the beginning).  Unfortunately, I have heard this story more than once.

Technology Mishap # 5:

Lack of personal connection.

My friend, Abby, summed it up best in a private message exchange:  

Abby:  Technology – as much as I love it – is impacting so much of our lives it’s ridiculous. I don’t sit on the subway or walk down the street one day where I don’t see at least half the people zoned out on their phones or ipods. We’re going into hibernation with ourselves! It’s sad, we’re all incredibly disconnected.

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/how-technology-can-ruin-a-relationship/feed/ 0 The Top 5 Foundations of a Healthy Relationship http://www.sittinginatree.com/the-top-5-foundations-of-a-healthy-relationship/ http://www.sittinginatree.com/the-top-5-foundations-of-a-healthy-relationship/#comments Sat, 04 May 2013 14:08:30 +0000 admin http://www.sittinginatree.com/?p=5598 Foundation # 1: Emotional availability

Emotional availability occurs when both individuals are open to, and prepared for, a relationship…should one develop – assuming they are not already in one. Very often I hear daters say:  ”I’m not looking for a relationship”.  Typically, that is a bunch of b.s. that daters tell not only others, but something they likely tell themselves.  Although one may not be “looking”, per se, anyone who is actively “dating” – even if the desire is lodged deep, deep, down inside of them – is hoping to find and secure that elusive “chemistry”.  When one person says to another person who they’ve been dating:  ”I’m not looking for a relationship”, what it really means is:  ”I’m not open to having a relationship with you“.  Harsh, but most often, true.  For those already in a relationship, emotional availability means that both partners are open to listening to each other’s feelings, thoughts, dreams and fears with the intent of understanding their partner, demonstrating active listening (which includes paraphrasing, asking probing questions and expressing empathy) and working together to address unmet needs and wants.

Foundation # 2: Alignment

Most people have been taught that for a relationship to work, one needs to be prepared to “compromise”.  It seems more productive for two people in a relationship to be aligned to the same goals than it is for them to negotiate and compromise different goals. Wanting the same outcomes and aligning themselves to those outcomes lessens the likelihood of resentment down the road.

For example, if one person really wants to spend the first three years of marriage travelling and the other person would prefer to stay at home and start a family and then travel later, only a compromise will work as the couple cannot do both at the same time.

Unfortunately though, a compromise is win/lose-win/lose where each person is giving up something and gaining only a fraction of what they wanted in the first place. It would be better to partner with someone who wants the same things from the get-go.

I acknowledge that the example provided is surmountable, and that compromise can work, however, alignment removes the requirement to negotiate and compromise and becomes more an issue of timing, financial resources and planning – together.

Foundation # 3: Commitment

This requires a declaration of some sort, from both parties, where each individual understands what they are committing to, what is expected of them by their partner and what “success” looks like. Commitment only lends itself to healthy relationships when it’s present on both sides. If one person is straddling the commitment fence, the foundation is cracked. Often we see people in “relationships” where one person doesn’t want a commitment. This allows them to enjoy the perks of the “relationship” without the associated and necessary accountability.

Foundation # 4: Emotional Predictability

While unpredictability may make dating interesting and exciting…it is not always ideal once a relationship has been established. Ideally, you know your partner well enough to anticipate their behaviour, reactions and demeanour on a day-to-day basis. You know who and what you’re coming home to.

This is not to suggest that healthy relationships should be boring, lacking in spontaneity and void of surprises…just not at every turn, and not on an emotional level.

Foundation # 5: Psychological Safety

This is all-encompassing, including trust, integrity, honesty, friendship and communication. It’s when your partner has your best interests in mind. Everything they do in your relationship comes from a place of kindness, sincerity and love. You are psychologically safe when you can say or do anything without fear of repercussions. The antithesis of walking on eggshells.

]]> http://www.sittinginatree.com/the-top-5-foundations-of-a-healthy-relationship/feed/ 0